The best book about writing that isn’t really about writing.
| Title | On Writing: A Memoir of the Craft |
| Author | Stephen King |
| Publisher | Scribner |
| Published | 2000 |
| Pages | 288 |
| Genre | Memoir / Craft |
| Availability | In print; widely available |
This post contains affiliate links. If you buy through them, I may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Full disclosure policy.
Bottom line: On Writing is still one of the best books about writing because it refuses to romanticize the work. King gives you memoir, craft advice, discipline, revision rules, and blunt warnings about bad habits without turning writing into a mystical calling. It is not a complete writing education, and his anti-plotting bias will not suit everyone, but for writers who need a practical kick in the pants, it remains close to essential.
Scribbright rating: 4.8 out of 5
Price~$10.99–$30.00, depending on format and sellerThere are two kinds of writing books. The first kind tells you how to write. The second kind makes you want to. For example, I devoured John Gardner’s The Art of Fiction once upon a time, and it was a brilliant book of criticism and instruction that made me not want to write, for various reasons I don’t want to revisit.
On Writing is emphatically the second kind, which is why it’s survived nearly three decades while most of its contemporaries have fallen off the shelves.
King wrote it in two bursts, separated by the accident that nearly killed him in 1999. A van struck him while he was walking along a Maine road, and he finished the book in recovery, in considerable pain, which gives the second half a quality the first half doesn’t quite have. He was writing toward something. You can feel it.
What It Is
On Writing is half memoir, half craft manual, and fully honest about which half matters more. The memoir section — King calls it a “C.V.” — covers his childhood, his early failures, his marriage to Tabitha, his alcoholism, his recovery, and the grinding years of writing in rented rooms and mobile homes before Carrie changed everything. It reads like King fiction: fast, specific, built on detail rather than abstraction.
The craft section covers the things King actually believes about writing: read a lot, write a lot, get the first draft down with the door closed and the second draft with it open, cut adverbs, don’t use passive construction as a hiding place, trust your characters to know where the story is going. The advice is direct to the point of bluntness, occasionally dogmatic, and mostly correct.
The two halves are more unified than they appear. King isn’t teaching you technique in the abstract — he’s showing you what technique looks like embedded in a life, which is a harder and more useful thing to demonstrate.
What Works
The memoir section works because King doesn’t romanticize anything. The early years are unglamorous — bad jobs, thin money, a typewriter balanced on a child’s desk in a trailer — and he describes them without self-pity or false modesty. He was a writer because he couldn’t not be, and he says so plainly, and the plainness is the point.
The craft section works because it’s grounded in practice rather than theory. King isn’t telling you what writing should look like in the abstract. He’s telling you what he does, what he’s learned works, and what he thinks is a waste of time. You can disagree with him — and plenty of writers have — but the disagreements are productive ones because he’s making specific, arguable claims rather than offering vague encouragement.
The section on revision is the most underrated part of the book. King’s formula — second draft equals first draft minus ten percent — is blunter than most editorial advice you’ll encounter, and more useful than most of it too.
Personal sidebar: King insists on writing with the door closed, meaning a first draft is written without self-editing, without stopping to revise, without judgment. For ADHD writers like me, the internal critic that interrupts flow is a nasty obstacle. King’s framework gives us explicit permission to just get it down and fix it later, which aligns well with how ADHD hyperfocus works when you launch into it.
What Doesn’t
King is openly hostile to plotting, which is fine as a personal preference and tiresome as a prescription. His argument that stories are found rather than constructed works for the kind of fiction he writes; it’s less persuasive when applied wholesale to other forms. Writers who work from outlines will find this section either galvanizing or annoying, depending on their disposition. I’ve been both at different readings; nowadays, I line up on the “plot till you drop” side of things.
The toolbox metaphor, King’s framework for thinking about vocabulary, grammar, and style as layered tools in a writer’s kit, is useful but underworked. He introduces it well and then moves on before it’s fully developed. It’s the section that most feels like it could have been twice as long.
The Part That Stuck
King describes the moment he learned his wife had saved the first pages of Carrie from the trash, where he’d thrown them after deciding the story wasn’t working. She’d read it, believed in it, and told him to keep going. It’s a small scene in a book full of larger ones, but it’s the scene I (and a lot of other writers) have thought about the most. Writing is not a solitary act in the way we like to pretend. It happens in the presence of other people, even when no one else is in the room.
That’s not a craft lesson. It’s a lesson in why we’re doing this in the first place. We’re not here casting words into a vacuum.
The Verdict
On Writing is the most recommended writing book for a reason. It earns the recommendation not because it tells you everything about writing (spoiler, it doesn’t) but because it makes the work feel possible and worth doing, which is the thing most writing books fail at. Read it if you haven’t. Read it again if you have.
If you’ve already been through On Writing and want King in critic mode rather than teacher mode, Danse Macabre is the companion volume: his survey of horror fiction and film that covers different territory with the same honesty.
Michael Semer is a writer and editor who has read this book three times and found different things to argue with each time, which is probably what King intended.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is On Writing about? It’s part memoir, part craft manual. The first half covers King’s life as a writer — childhood, early failures, alcoholism, recovery — and the second half covers his practical beliefs about how to write well. The two halves are more connected than they sound.
Is On Writing only for fiction writers? No. King writes fiction, but the principles he covers — reading widely, writing daily, cutting what isn’t working, trusting your instincts on revision — apply across forms. Journalists, essayists, and copywriters have all found it useful.
Is On Writing worth reading if you don’t like Stephen King’s fiction? Yes. King’s fiction and his beliefs about writing are related but separable. You don’t need to enjoy horror to find his advice on craft and discipline useful. The memoir section is worth reading on its own terms regardless of how you feel about his novels.
How does On Writing compare to Danse Macabre? They’re different books with different aims. On Writing is a craft manual for writers; Danse Macabre is cultural criticism for readers and fans of the horror genre. Most King readers will find value in both, but On Writing is the one to read first.
What’s King’s main advice in On Writing? Read a lot and write a lot. Get the first draft down without stopping to second-guess yourself. Cut adverbs. Avoid passive voice as a default. Trust your characters. Revise with a specific target — his rule is second draft equals first draft minus ten percent. The advice is blunt and practical, which is why it holds up.
Has On Writing held up since it was published in 2000? Better than most books of its kind. The specific craft advice is timeless, the memoir section is as readable now as it was on publication, and the book’s central argument — that writing is a craft learned through practice, not a gift bestowed on the chosen — remains the most useful thing anyone has said on the subject.